Skip to content

Created initial structure for future servicebus development #2597

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dawidpereira
Copy link

This PR sets up the foundational structure for the ⁠azure_messaging_servicebus library, including package configuration, initial README documentation, and licensing. It prepares the project for further development of the Azure Service Bus SDK.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Community Contribution Community members are working on the issue customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. labels May 11, 2025
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution @dawidpereira! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

@dawidpereira
Copy link
Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 11, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

azure_messaging_servicebus

@heaths
Copy link
Member

heaths commented May 12, 2025

Thank you for the contribution and your interest. Since we'll have to maintain this, we first need to prioritize it. @ronniegeraghty could you have a look? We should talk with the service team.

We are also a generation-first Azure SDK language, which means we generate as much as possible. For Service Bus that might be little to nothing - as with Event Hubs - but @LarryOsterman would be best to advise if we're ready to accept work currently.

Copy link
Member

@heaths heaths left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recommend holding off until we prioritize maintenance of a Service Bus crate. In general, I highly recommend opening issues first so we can prioritize accordingly.

@dawidpereira
Copy link
Author

I recommend holding off until we prioritize maintenance of a Service Bus crate. In general, I highly recommend opening issues first so we can prioritize accordingly.

Hi, sure I understand, thats why I started just with structure.
I created issue here for further discussion.

Copy link

Hi @dawidpereira. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Jul 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Community Contribution Community members are working on the issue customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants